○ Review methods *1 For some Basic Sections with a notably small number of applications under Scientific Research (B), joint reviews for multiple Basic Sections are conducted by six to twelve reviewers. [Two-Stage Document Review] (Example) Scientific Research (B/C), Challenging Research (Exploratory) and [Comprehensive Review] (Example) Scientific Research (A) and Challenging Research (Pioneering) Between six and eight reviewers are appointed for each proposal in the Scientific Research (A) and the Challenging Research (Pioneering) categories, and each proposal is subject to both a document review and a more thorough and multi-faceted panel review. As necessary, the review may include processes such as a preliminary screening and other screening. Early-Career Scientists Each proposal for the Scientific Research (B) is reviewed by six reviewers; each proposal for the Scientific Research (C) and the Early-Career Scientists is reviewed by four reviewers; each proposal for the Challenging Research (Exploratory) is reviewed by six to eight reviewers. As necessary, the review may include process a preliminary screening. *2 For Challenging Research (Exploratory), reviews are conducted in each Medium-sized Section. Comprehensive Review) (Two-Stage Document Review and [When applying]
元のページ ../index.html#20