○ Upon completion of review, the names of the review committee ○ Disclosure of the review results for research projects As for some research categories such as the Specially Promoted Research, the Scientific Research (S/A), and the Challenging Research (Pioneering), the approximate ranking, the opinions expressed in the review results, and some other items will be disclosed. As for some other research categories such as the Scientific Research (B/C), the Challenging Research (Exploratory) and the Early-Career Scientists, the approximate ranking, the review results by rating elements, the standard-format opinion, and some other items will be disclosed for research projects that were not adopted. ○ More than 8,000 researchers are involved in the review process. In order to ensure the fair selection of the highest-quality review committee members, JSPS makes use of a database of review committee candidates (with approximately 148,000 persons registered) consisting largely of researchers who themselves were selected for the KAKENHI funding. (*) Peer review refers to a process of reviews carried out by peers. For Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI), prominent researchers who work hard at each academic field and stand at the front of knowledge creation, review and assess the applications for their peers. The KAKENHI review process is possible thanks to the cooperation of researchers. JSPS asks researchers’ positive participation in the review process. [When applying] members are disclosed on the KAKENHI website. 6. How are applications reviewed? A peer review (*) process is carried out in order to select high quality research projects.
元のページ ../index.html#18