|
1. What prompted you decide to participate in the "JSPS Science Dialogue" program?
I believe that the scientists job is to disseminate their findings to the public - it's part of the job. Moreover, as the JSPS position is funded by the Japanese public, and so I believe that I have a deeper obligation in this case.
2. To what did you give greatest attention in preparing and giving the lecture?
Communication - I was aware that not only was I speaking in English, but also that my topic is quite difficult. I was concerned that the lecture was too hard, or easy. My colleague was able to advise me on an appropriate level.
3. Did you find it difficult to give a lecture in English to Japanese students? Could you give some advice to future lecturers on how to facilitate communication with Japanese students?
I think that the very best way is to take a qualified, English-speaking colleague. As always, avoid long words, elaborate similes, jargon, speak slowly, etc.
4. Could you give your impression with regard to participating in this program?
I really enjoy talking with students. I'm completely impressed by the attention that Japan give to science education. The organization and structure of the event seemed rigorous and very productive.
5. Was it meaningful in terms of your fellowship activities?
When I'm preparing an outreach presentation, more often than not, I learn a tremendous amount about the subject, because I'm forced to look at it in a different way. I'm asked questions from a different perspective.
6. In what ways do you think the students benefited from the program?
My subject was a difficult one (I think), and I didn't really expect students to leave being experts in astrophysics - what I hope has happened is that they have a better appreciation for the application of physics, and a more clear impression of astronomy, and how humanity fits in to the Universe.
|
